Canon and controversies: The complex history of the Bible

History of the Bible
© History Skills

The Bible is a revered compilation of sacred texts that has played a pivotal role in shaping the history, culture, and belief systems of the western world.

 

With its origins tracing back over two millennia, this collection of writings has been the cornerstone of religious traditions, particularly within Judaism and Christianity.

 

However, most people are unaware of the story of how the Bible came to be.

The origins and development of the biblical books

The oldest elements of the Bible have their origins in ancient times, with its earliest components believed to have been written around the 12th century BCE.

 

The Hebrew Bible is divided into three main sections: the Torah (Law), the Nevi'im (Prophets), and the Ketuvim (Writings).

 

The Torah, comprising the first five books, is considered the foundational text and was likely compiled during the 6th and 5th centuries BCE, following the Babylonian Exile.

 

It includes the creation narrative, the patriarchal stories, the Exodus from Egypt, the giving of the Law at Sinai, and the wanderings in the desert.

 

The Nevi'im includes historical accounts of the Israelite kingdoms, as well as the words of the prophets who called for adherence to the covenant with God.

 

These books were written and compiled over several centuries, with some of the later prophetic books dating from the post-exilic period.

 

The Ketuvim, or Writings, is a diverse collection of books, including poetry (Psalms, Song of Songs, Lamentations), wisdom literature (Proverbs, Ecclesiastes), and historical narratives (Esther, Daniel).

 

The exact timeline for the compilation of the Ketuvim is less clear, but it is generally believed to have been completed by the 2nd century BCE.

Ancient scroll
© History Skills

The New Testament, central to Christianity, emerged in the 1st and 2nd centuries CE.

 

The New Testament consists of 27 books, including the four Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, the Pauline and General Epistles, and the Book of Revelation.

 

The Gospels, which narrate the life, teachings, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, were written between the late 1st and early 2nd centuries CE.

 

They were based on oral traditions and earlier written sources. The Acts of the Apostles, attributed to the author of the Gospel of Luke, provides an account of the early Christian community and the spread of the Gospel.

 

The Epistles, or letters, were written by apostles or their followers to address specific issues in early Christian communities.

 

The Pauline Epistles, attributed to the Apostle Paul, form a significant part of the New Testament and were among the earliest Christian writings.

 

All of these texts were written in Koine Greek, the lingua franca of the Eastern Mediterranean at the time.


How were the books of the Bible decided?

The formation of the biblical canon was a gradual process that unfolded over several centuries.

 

The process of canonization of the Jewish Old Testament was not formalized in a single council or decree but emerged through the consensus of Jewish communities over time.

 

By the 2nd century BCE, the Torah was already established as a central component, with the Prophets and the Writings being added later.

 

Certain criteria were likely considered, such as the text's religious authority, its use in worship, and its consistency with the teachings of the Torah.

 

The final form of the Hebrew Bible was recognized by Jewish scholars and communities by the end of the 1st century CE, although discussions about the inclusion of certain books continued for some time.

In contrast, the New Testament's canonical formation was influenced by the early Christian community's need to define its sacred literature amidst diverse theological perspectives.

 

The process of recognizing the canonical status of these texts was gradual. Key criteria for inclusion were apostolic authorship, conformity to the rule of faith, and widespread acceptance among churches. 

 

By the end of the 2nd century CE, there was a general consensus on the core texts, although debates continued over some books.

 

Formal recognition of the New Testament canon came in the 4th century CE, with significant milestones at the Councils of Hippo (393 CE) and Carthage (397 CE), where the current 27-book structure was affirmed.

 

This canonization process was not a single event but a culmination of ongoing discussions and discernment within the Christian community.

A stack of antique books
© History Skills

The problem of copying the biblical texts over time

Initially, the words of the Bible were passed down orally, with written records beginning to appear around the 12th century BCE.

 

Scribes played a crucial role in this process, copying manuscripts by hand with painstaking attention to detail.

 

Their dedication to accuracy was evident in their methods, which included counting letters and words to ensure that no errors were made.

 

The translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek, known as the Septuagint, in the 3rd century BCE, marked a significant milestone, making the scriptures accessible to the Hellenistic world.

 

This translation played a crucial role in the spread of Judaism and early Christianity.

 

The Latin Vulgate, translated by Jerome in the late 4th century CE, became the authoritative version of the Bible for the Western Church for over a millennium. 

The invention of the printing press in the 15th century CE revolutionized the dissemination of the Bible.

 

Johannes Gutenberg's printed Bible in the 1450s allowed for faster production and wider distribution, making the scriptures more accessible to the general public.

 

This period also saw the rise of vernacular translations, such as Martin Luther's German Bible and the English translations by William Tyndale and the King James Version. 

 

This period also saw the rise of critical scholarship, with efforts to reconstruct the original texts and understand their historical contexts.

Biblical scholar in a library
© History Skills

How reliable are the surviving biblical texts?

Skeptics have questioned the veracity of certain biblical events and figures, citing a lack of archaeological evidence or conflicting historical records.

 

This has led to ongoing discussions about the nature of the Bible as a historical document versus a theological or allegorical text.

 

The choices made by translators regarding language, syntax, and interpretation can significantly impact the meaning and reception of the text.

 

This has led to debates over which translations are most faithful to the original manuscripts and which are influenced by theological or cultural agendas.

The inclusion and exclusion of certain books in the biblical canon have also been a source of contention.

 

The Apocrypha, a collection of texts included in some versions of the Bible but not in others, exemplifies this issue.

 

Disagreements over canonical status reflect broader theological and doctrinal differences among Christian traditions.

The 19th and 20th centuries saw a surge in archaeological expeditions in the Middle East, uncovering ancient cities, inscriptions, and artifacts that provide valuable insights into the world of the biblical texts.

 

One of the most significant discoveries was the Dead Sea Scrolls, found in caves near Qumran between 1947 and 1956.

 

These ancient manuscripts, dating back to the 2nd century BCE, include the oldest known copies of the Hebrew Bible, as well as other religious and sectarian texts.

 

The scrolls have shed light on the diversity of Jewish religious thought during the Second Temple period and have helped scholars understand the textual development of the Bible.