How the gruesome Plague of Justinian shook the Byzantine Empire

Constantinople plague
© History Skills

Throughout our history, pandemics have created moments of crisis. Among these, the Plague of Justinian stands as one of the earliest and most devastating.

 

Named after the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I, who reigned during its first outbreak, this plague swept across the known world in the mid-6th century, leaving a trail of death and despair in its wake.

 

But what were the origins of this plague?

 

How did it spread so rapidly and widely?

 

And what were its immediate and long-term impacts on society, culture, and the Byzantine Empire?

The Byzantine Empire under Emperor Justinian I

The mid-6th century was a time of significant change and upheaval in the Byzantine Empire, largely due to the ambitious reign of Emperor Justinian I.

Justinian ascended to the throne in 527 AD, inheriting an empire that was a shadow of the former Roman Empire.

 

Determined to restore Rome to its former glory, Justinian embarked on a series of military campaigns to reclaim lost territories, a venture that stretched the empire's resources and left it vulnerable.

 

His reign was also marked by significant legal and architectural achievements, including the codification of Roman law and the construction of the Hagia Sophia, one of the most iconic structures of the ancient world.

The socio-political climate of the 6th century was complex. The Byzantine Empire, while powerful, was surrounded by potential enemies, including the Ostrogoths in Italy, the Vandals in North Africa, and the Sassanid Empire in the east.

 

Internally, the empire was rife with religious and social tensions, with disputes over Christian doctrine often leading to civil unrest.

 

The economy was heavily reliant on agriculture and trade, with the latter facilitating connections with distant lands but also exposing the empire to external threats.


The sudden arrival of the plague

The origins of the Plague of Justinian remain a subject of historical and scientific inquiry.

 

The most widely accepted theory posits that the plague originated in China or Central Asia, carried westward by rats aboard merchant ships along bustling trade routes.

 

These rats harbored fleas infected with Yersinia pestis, the bacterium responsible for the plague.

 

When the rats died, the fleas would seek new hosts, transmitting the disease to humans.

The first recorded outbreak of the plague occurred in the port city of Pelusium, in Egypt, in 541 AD.

 

From there, it spread rapidly along maritime trade routes throughout the Mediterranean, reaching Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire, in the spring of 542 AD.

 

The city, a bustling hub of commerce and culture, was an ideal breeding ground for the plague.

 

Its crowded streets and inadequate sanitation facilities facilitated the rapid spread of the disease.

The plague did not discriminate, affecting both rural and urban areas, the rich and the poor, the young and the old.

 

Contemporary accounts describe a swift and terrifying illness, with victims often dying within days of showing symptoms.

 

The speed and severity of the plague, combined with the lack of effective medical treatments, resulted in high mortality rates.


What were the symptoms of the Plague of Justinian?

Contemporary accounts, such as those by the Byzantine historian Procopius, provide vivid descriptions of the illness.

 

Victims often experienced the sudden onset of fever and chills, followed by weakness and fatigue.

 

Other symptoms included headache, dizziness, and a rapid pulse. Within a few days, sufferers would develop swollen and painful lymph nodes, or 'buboes', typically in the groin, armpit, or neck.

 

These buboes gave the disease its name 'bubonic plague'. In some cases, the infection spread to the bloodstream or lungs, leading to septicemic or pneumonic plague, both of which had even higher fatality rates.

Diagnosing the plague in the 6th century was a challenge. Medical knowledge at the time was rudimentary, and the concept of infectious diseases was not well understood.

 

Physicians relied on observation and the patient's description of symptoms to make a diagnosis.

 

Treatments, often based on the four humors theory of medicine, were largely ineffective.

 

The lack of understanding about the nature of the disease, combined with the absence of effective treatments, contributed to the high mortality rate and widespread fear associated with the plague.

Modern understanding of the Plague of Justinian has been greatly enhanced by advancements in genetic research.

 

In 2013, scientists were able to extract Yersinia pestis DNA from the teeth of two 6th-century skeletons buried in Bavaria.

 

This confirmed that Yersinia pestis, the same bacterium responsible for the Black Death and modern plague outbreaks, was the causative agent of the Plague of Justinian.

Plague of Justinian
© History Skills

How deadly was it?

The Plague of Justinian had a profound impact on the Byzantine Empire and the broader ancient world.

 

Its immediate effects were devastating, with death toll estimates ranging from 25 to 50 million people, a significant proportion of the world's population at the time.

 

The plague decimated entire communities, leaving towns and cities deserted and causing a severe labor shortage.

 

This had a knock-on effect on the economy, as fields went untended and trade networks were disrupted.

The plague also had significant demographic consequences. The high mortality rate, particularly among the young and productive members of society, led to a population decline that took centuries to recover.

 

This demographic shift had far-reaching social and economic implications, altering the balance of power and reshaping societal structures.

The psychological impact of the plague should not be underestimated. The sudden and widespread death caused by the plague led to a sense of despair and fear.

 

This was reflected in the art and literature of the time, which often depicted scenes of death and devastation.

 

The plague also influenced religious beliefs, with many viewing the disease as a divine punishment for sins.

 

This led to an increase in religious fervor and the proliferation of apocalyptic beliefs.


How the plague impacted the survival of the empire

The high mortality rate of the plague led to a significant labor shortage. This had a profound effect on society, as traditional roles and hierarchies were disrupted.

 

In many areas, peasants were able to demand higher wages due to the scarcity of labor.

 

This led to social mobility for some, but also increased tension between different social classes.

 

The plague also had a significant impact on the economy. Trade networks were disrupted, and many businesses collapsed due to the loss of workers and customers.

 

This economic downturn further exacerbated social inequalities, as the rich were better able to withstand the economic shock than the poor.

Culturally, the Plague of Justinian left a deep imprint. The widespread death and suffering caused by the plague were reflected in the art and literature of the time.

 

Many works depicted scenes of death and despair, reflecting the societal mood. The plague also influenced philosophical and theological debates, with many questioning why a just God would allow such suffering.

Religion played a crucial role in how people made sense of and coped with the plague.

 

Many saw the plague as a divine punishment for sins, leading to an increase in religious fervor.

 

Some turned to asceticism and mysticism, while others participated in processions and public prayers in an attempt to appease the divine wrath.

 

The plague also led to the scapegoating of marginalized groups, who were blamed for bringing the divine punishment.


How did Emperor Justinian respond to the crisis?

As the ruler of the Byzantine Empire during the initial outbreak, Justinian was forced to navigate the crisis with limited understanding of the disease and few effective tools at his disposal.

 

Justinian himself contracted the plague but survived, a testament to the indiscriminate nature of the disease.

 

His personal experience with the plague may have influenced his subsequent response.

 

Despite the crisis, Justinian remained committed to his ambitious plans to restore the Roman Empire, continuing his military campaigns even as the plague ravaged his lands.

The Byzantine government took several measures to manage the crisis. These included the provision of free food and wine to the populace of Constantinople during the height of the outbreak, in an attempt to maintain order and prevent a complete societal breakdown.

 

The government also undertook efforts to dispose of the bodies of plague victims, which were often left in the streets due to the overwhelming number of deaths.

 

These bodies were collected and buried in mass graves, or in some cases, thrown into the sea.

Despite these efforts, the Byzantine government's response to the plague was largely reactive rather than proactive.

 

There was no understanding of how the disease spread, and thus no effective measures to control it.

 

Quarantine, a common response to disease outbreaks today, was not practiced. The government's ability to provide relief was also limited by the economic strain caused by the plague and ongoing military campaigns.