Perestroika and Glasnost: The most important catalysts for the end of the Cold War?

Perestroika and Glasnost
© History Skills

As the 20th century neared its final decade, the Soviet Union stood at the precipice of monumental change. The twin policies of Perestroika and Glasnost, introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev, promised to usher in an era of economic liberalization and political openness unprecedented in the history of the USSR.

 

These reforms were met with a storm of public discourse, political maneuvering, and a cascade of events that would eventually lead to the dissolution of one of the world’s superpowers.

 

But what drove the Soviet leadership to embark on such radical reforms?

 

How did the citizens of the Soviet Union react to the sudden shift in policy?

 

And in what ways did these changes lead to the Soviet Union's unexpected and swift collapse? 

The mounting problems in Soviet Russia

Before the advent of Perestroika and Glasnost, the Soviet Union was entrenched in a period of deep economic stagnation and political rigidity.

 

The leadership that followed the death of Joseph Stalin in 1953 had struggled to maintain the balance between maintaining a strict socialist regime and addressing the needs of a changing world.

 

By the time Leonid Brezhnev took the helm in 1964, the Soviet Union had solidified its position as a superpower through its nuclear arsenal and the reach of its ideology.

 

However, the Brezhnev era, which lasted until his death in 1982, was characterized by a significant slowdown in economic growth and a hardening of the political system, a period often referred to as the Era of Stagnation.

The Soviet economy, heavily reliant on large-scale industrial and military production, was ill-equipped to adapt to the technological advancements that were driving progress in the West.

 

Centralized planning led to widespread inefficiencies and a lack of innovation, with the economy suffering from chronic shortages of consumer goods.

 

The agricultural sector was particularly beleaguered, with the 1972 purchase of wheat from the United States highlighting its inability to feed the Soviet population.

Internationally, the Soviet Union's involvement in Afghanistan, beginning in December 1979, became a draining military conflict that drew comparisons to the United States' experience in Vietnam.

 

The war was both a financial burden and a source of international condemnation, further isolating the Soviet Union during a time when it could ill afford additional economic or diplomatic pressures.

 

By the early 1980s, it was becoming increasingly clear that the Soviet Union needed reform.

 

The death of Brezhnev in 1982 and the subsequent short tenures of Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chernenko did little to address the growing economic and social issues.

 

It was not until Mikhail Gorbachev was appointed General Secretary of the Communist Party in March 1985 that the stage was set for significant change. 

A group of Soviet citizens queuing outside a grocery store
© History Skills

Who was Mikhail Gorbachev?

Born in 1931 into a peasant family in the Stavropol region, Gorbachev rose through the ranks of the Communist Party, distinguishing himself with his legal education and his commitment to the Komsomol, the youth division of the party.

 

His ascension to the role of General Secretary in March 1985 was met with a cautious optimism by those who hoped for reform and with skepticism by party hardliners who feared it.

Gorbachev was acutely aware of the deep-seated issues plaguing the Soviet system.

 

The economy was faltering under the weight of bureaucratic inefficiency and a lack of innovation, while the political structure was suffocating under the heavy hand of the KGB and the inflexibility of the Communist Party's old guard.

 

Gorbachev's observations during his time in agricultural and party positions had convinced him of the need for fundamental change.

 

He was influenced by a new generation of thinkers and reformers, including economists like Abel Aganbegyan and Leonid Abalkin, who advocated for significant economic reforms.

Gorbachev's policies of Perestroika and Glasnost, which he introduced in the mid-1980s, were in many ways a response to the deep-seated problems that had been ignored or inadequately addressed by his predecessors.

 

These policies aimed to revitalize the Soviet Union by reforming its economy and society, but they would also unintentionally set the stage for its eventual collapse.


Perestroika: Restructuring the soviet economy

Perestroika was Mikhail Gorbachev's ambitious program aimed at restructuring the Soviet economy.

 

This policy was predicated on the belief that the existing command economy, characterized by rigid state control over all aspects of production and distribution, was unsustainable and incapable of meeting the needs of the Soviet people.

 

The central planning system, with its five-year plans and production quotas, had led to widespread inefficiencies, lack of innovation, and a chronic shortage of consumer goods.

 

The core of Perestroika was economic reform. Gorbachev's plan involved the decentralization of economic management and the introduction of market mechanisms alongside the planned economy.

 

One of the key terms associated with Perestroika was "uskorenie," which means acceleration, reflecting the goal to speed up economic development.

 

Another was "samoupravlenie," or self-management, which aimed to give enterprises more autonomy from state control, allowing them to make decisions based on market demand rather than government directives.

Gorbachev introduced the concept of "khozraschet," or profitability, as a standard for Soviet enterprises, a stark shift from the previous focus on fulfilling quotas regardless of cost or demand.

 

This was intended to incentivize efficiency and quality, with the idea that enterprises should be self-financed and responsible for their own profits and losses.

 

Additionally, the law on state enterprises, passed in 1987, was a significant move towards economic liberalization, granting more independence to managers and urging them to seek profitability.

 

Another significant aspect of Perestroika was the introduction of "leasing," where workers could lease land, equipment, and other assets from the state, which was a move towards private ownership.

 

This policy was particularly impactful in the agricultural sector, where the inefficiency of collective farms was notorious.

 

The aim was to boost agricultural productivity by giving farmers a personal stake in the output.

Perestroika also opened the door for foreign investment, which was a radical departure from the previous isolationist policies.

 

Joint ventures with foreign companies were encouraged, allowing an influx of capital, technology, and management practices from the West.

 

This exposure to global economic practices was intended to modernize Soviet industry and integrate it into the world economy.

Soviet street during the Perestroika era
© History Skills

Glasnost: The policy of openness

Glasnost, meaning "openness," was a policy introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev that aimed to bring transparency to the workings of the Soviet government and encourage public discourse.

 

This policy marked a significant departure from the repressive norms that had characterized the Soviet Union for decades, where censorship was widespread, and the flow of information was tightly controlled by the state.

 

Glasnost was intended to foster a culture of open discussion, where the problems facing society could be addressed more effectively through public debate and criticism.

 

The policy of Glasnost touched several aspects of Soviet life. In the media, it allowed for a previously unseen level of freedom in reporting and commentary.

 

Newspapers, television, and radio began to discuss issues that had been taboo, such as high-level corruption, the shortcomings of the Soviet economy, and the negative impacts of Stalin's purges during the 1930s, a period referred to as the "Great Terror."

 

This newfound freedom led to a flourishing of opinions and the emergence of new publications that did not shy away from criticizing the government.

In the cultural sphere, Glasnost resulted in the release and publication of works by previously banned authors.

 

Books that had been suppressed for their political or ideological content were now allowed, and authors who had been living in exile or in obscurity found their voices heard.

 

This cultural thaw allowed for a re-examination of Soviet history and provided a space for the arts to explore a range of social and political themes without fear of repression.

 

Glasnost also had significant implications for the political environment. It allowed for the airing of grievances and opened up the political process to some degree.

 

Political discussions and dissent were tolerated to an extent that would have been unthinkable just a few years prior.

 

This openness led to the formation of new political clubs and movements, some of which began to challenge the Communist Party's monopoly on power.

One of the key terms associated with Glasnost was "demokratizatsiya," or democratization, which referred to the introduction of democratic elements into the Soviet political system.

 

While not a move towards full democracy as understood in the West, it was an acknowledgment that the Soviet system needed to be more responsive to its citizens.


How did the Soviet Union respond to these ideas?

When Mikhail Gorbachev introduced these policies in the mid-1980s, they were initially met with a sense of hope and expectation among many Soviet citizens.

 

After decades of economic stagnation and political repression, the prospect of reform and openness was a breath of fresh air.

 

However, as the policies began to take effect, their impact and the reactions to them became more complex and, at times, deeply divisive.

 

Perestroika, with its economic reforms, was initially welcomed by many who were frustrated with the chronic shortages and inefficiencies of the planned economy.

 

The Law on State Enterprises, passed in 1987, was one of the first major legislative acts of Perestroika, granting more autonomy to enterprise managers and aiming to increase productivity through market-like incentives.

 

However, the transition proved difficult. The lack of a clear roadmap for the transition to a market economy, combined with the entrenched bureaucracy that resisted change, led to confusion and economic dislocation.

 

By the late 1980s, the economy was in a state of flux, with the old system dismantled enough to cause disruption but not replaced by a functioning new order, leading to a decline in production and a rise in inflation.

Glasnost, for its part, unleashed a wave of pent-up dissatisfaction. The policy allowed citizens to express their discontent openly for the first time in generations.

 

The media, taking advantage of the new freedoms, reported on issues such as corruption, the environmental disaster of the Aral Sea, and the catastrophic accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in 1986.

 

This openness led to a surge in public debate and the formation of various informal political groups and movements, some of which began to demand more radical reforms than those proposed by Gorbachev.

 

One of the most significant domestic responses to Glasnost was the rise of nationalist movements within the various republics of the Soviet Union.

 

In the Baltics, for example, movements such as the Lithuanian Sąjūdis, established in 1988, sought greater autonomy and eventually independence.

 

Similar movements gained momentum in other republics, including the Rukh movement in Ukraine and the National Front in Azerbaijan.

 

These movements were emboldened by the atmosphere of openness and began to challenge the central Soviet authority directly.

The Communist Party itself was deeply split over the reforms. While some members saw Perestroika and Glasnost as necessary for the survival of the Soviet system, others perceived them as a betrayal of socialist principles.

 

This division reached a critical point in 1990 when the 28th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union exposed the deep rifts within the party.

 

The hardliners, who were losing their grip on power, were increasingly vocal in their opposition to Gorbachev's policies.

 

The general populace's reaction was also mixed. While many intellectuals and urban residents supported the reforms, others, particularly those in the working class and in rural areas, were disoriented by the rapid changes and the uncertainty that came with them.

 

The lifting of price controls in 1990, for example, led to a spike in the cost of living, eroding the standard of living for many and causing widespread discontent.


How did the world react to these changes?

In the West, Gorbachev's initiatives were generally welcomed. The United States, under President Ronald Reagan, had adopted a hardline stance against what it termed the "Evil Empire."

 

Yet, the introduction of Perestroika and Glasnost signaled a possible thawing of Cold War tensions.

 

The Reykjavik Summit in October 1986, where Reagan and Gorbachev discussed arms reduction, albeit without a final agreement, was an early indication that the Soviet Union was serious about change.

 

This was followed by the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in December 1987, which marked a significant de-escalation in nuclear arms competition.

 

European nations, particularly those in the West, saw Gorbachev's policies as an opportunity to bridge the East-West divide.

 

Leaders like Margaret Thatcher of the United Kingdom, who famously declared Gorbachev a man "we can do business with," were instrumental in fostering a new relationship with the Soviet Union.

 

West Germany's Chancellor Helmut Kohl saw an opportunity to engage more constructively with the East, which would eventually have implications for German reunification.

In Eastern Europe, the response was more complex. The governments of the Warsaw Pact countries, which had long relied on Soviet support to maintain their communist regimes, were unsettled by the reforms.

 

The policies of Perestroika and Glasnost were seen as a threat to their own grip on power.

 

This unease was justified as, by 1989, a wave of revolutions swept across Eastern Europe, with events like the fall of the Berlin Wall in November signaling the end of Soviet influence in the region.

 

China, another communist giant, observed the unfolding events in the Soviet Union with concern.

 

The Chinese leadership, particularly after the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989, rejected Gorbachev's approach, doubling down on their own political control while pursuing economic reform in a more controlled and gradual manner.

Berlin Wall's graffiti-covered west side with a solitary figure passing by
© History Skills

In the Global South, the Soviet Union's traditional allies were uncertain about how the changes would affect their relationships.

 

Countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, which had relied on Soviet support for their socialist-oriented policies or as a counterbalance to American influence, were left to reassess their positions in a world where the Soviet Union was no longer a predictable ally.

 

The international financial institutions and economic forums cautiously anticipated the potential integration of the Soviet economy into the global market system.

 

The prospect of a vast new market opening up and the potential for political stability in a post-Cold War era were seen as positive, albeit uncertain, developments.


Did these policies cause the collapse of the USSR?

The economic stagnation that had plagued the Soviet Union for decades was exacerbated by Gorbachev's Perestroika reforms.

 

While these reforms were intended to revitalize the Soviet economy, they instead led to greater instability.

 

The liberalization of prices in 1990, intended to reflect the true cost of goods, resulted in hyperinflation, which eroded the savings of the Soviet populace and led to widespread discontent.

 

Glasnost, while opening up the Soviet society to more freedom of expression and information, also allowed nationalistic and separatist sentiments to surface.

 

The Chernobyl disaster in April 1986, and the government's mishandling of the event, further eroded public trust in the Communist Party.

 

By the late 1980s, the Baltic states were agitating for independence, with Lithuania declaring itself independent in March 1990, followed by Latvia and Estonia.

The political landscape of the Soviet Union was changing rapidly. In March 1990, the Congress of People's Deputies amended the Soviet constitution to eliminate the Communist Party's monopoly on power.

 

This was a clear indication that the Soviet political system was breaking down.

 

The rise of Boris Yeltsin, who was elected President of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic in June 1991, challenged Gorbachev's authority and signaled a shift in power away from the central Soviet government.

 

The August Coup of 1991 was perhaps the most dramatic event in the downfall of the Soviet Union.

 

Hardline members of the government and the KGB, opposed to Gorbachev's reforms and the loss of central control, attempted to take over the government.

 

The coup failed within a few days, largely due to the mass public demonstrations in Moscow and the refusal of the military to enforce the coup leaders' orders.

 

Boris Yeltsin's defiant stand against the coup leaders, famously standing on a tank outside the Russian White House, became a symbol of resistance.

The failure of the coup accelerated the disintegration of the Soviet Union.

 

By the end of 1991, the Soviet republics had declared their independence, and on December 8, 1991, the leaders of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus signed the Belavezha Accords, which declared the Soviet Union dissolved and established the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in its place.

 

Gorbachev resigned as President of the Soviet Union on December 25, 1991, and the next day, the Supreme Soviet, the highest governmental body of the Soviet Union, recognized the collapse of the Soviet Union and dissolved itself.